How to Find Passion in Your Work

passionAsk yourself: How much do you love doing what you do? For most of us there’ll be some bits we really don’t enjoy (admin in my case!), but ideally there’ll be many aspects of our role that make our heart zing!

If that isn’t the case, read on for ways to address any malaise…

One way of finding your perfect role is to start by looking at what I call your marketable assets. Make a list of the projects you’ve been involved with and then look objectively at your experience, skills and network. Answer these six questions honestly:

  1. What experience and knowledge do you have? Summarise the key areas.
  2. What might be missing which, if added to your experience and knowledge, would make you more of a ‘wow’?
  3. What key skills do you have (perhaps commented on in performance reviews) that help you stand out from others?
  4. Where are your personal development needs (ie if addressed would open up exciting new opportunities)?
  5. Who in your network do you know really well, both inside your firm and in the market place – they enjoy working with you and think you’re talented?
  6. Who might you need to get to know better so that new doors might open?

So that’s an audit of you. Then look at the market to assess the attractiveness of the options available to you. Take each aspect of your work and assess the following:

  1. How big is that area of work (score it H=there’s lots of work, M=a medium amount or L=this is a specialist field)?
  2. To what extent is that area of work likely to grow (H= it’s growing, M=static, L=this is in decline)?
  3. How profitable is the work (H=no problem selling at top rates, M=medium or L= lots of discounting required)?
  4. How strategically important are these areas of work to your firm (H=important and there’s likely to be good investment, M=some limited interest, L= no interest)

Then you compare your answers to try to find a match between your experience, skills and network and attractive market opportunities. If you find a match you are well on your way.

But now the big question…how passionate do you feel about focusing your career on developing that work stream? Does the thought of concentrating on such work make your heart zing? I would say you need to score it at least 8 out of 10 on the passion-ometer!

If the area scores less than that, go back to your analysis until you find your heart zinging!

You may find that your passion diminishes in your mid-career period. Maybe there’s just been too much repetition. All you need to do is to repeat this reflection and move on…

If you need to motivate others in your team, have a look at https://tonyreiss.com/2015/04/27/what-can-managers-do-to-motivate-their-team/

Posted in Leadership and Management, Managing Change, Strategy | Tagged , | Leave a comment

David and Goliath – The Potential Advantages of Smaller Firms

 

goliathIf you find yourself competing against a much larger competitor, be encouraged. They have weaknesses! Just as Goliath did against David!

Part of the challenge for the mega firms is that they don’t easily see their weaknesses.

Consider an analysis of David and Goliath’s apparent strengths and weaknesses, as follows:

David’s strengths – Very brave

David’s weaknesses – Small, inexperienced in one-on-one combat, no armour

Goliath’s strengths – Huge, strong, experienced, good armour and brave

Goliath’s weaknesses -???

Doesn’t look good for David. But the analysis is misleading. The analysis misses several things:

  • David is quick
  • David is good with a catapult (slingshot) and has it with him
  • There are small stones on the ground
  • Goliath’s armour doesn’t cover his forehead

It turns out that you might be like David –  thinking you have apparent weaknesses, but actually with potential strategic advantages.

It’s very difficult for the larger firms to spot their weaknesses – the biggest of which are potentially complacency and poor strategic analysis.

Whether you are a David or Goliath, don’t be complacent about your strategic analysis.

Acknowledgement: The David & Goliath analysis is based on Good Strategy Bad Strategy by Richard Rumelt. See http://goodbadstrategy.com/

Posted in Leadership and Management, Managing Change, Strategy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Here’s to a More Fulfilling 2017!

What will 2017 bring? Well, it has to true that if you approach the year in the same way as you did 2016 you’re highly likely to get similar results. If you didn’t find 2016 a positive experience, full of personal growth, read on…..

An important aspect of our approach to work is what we might call our outlook or attitude. You can describe this as how we choose to see things and how we choose to react to situations and people.

The choices made by many executives leave them feeling somewhat flat, pessimistic, anxious or simply too burdened to be really happy in their roles.

You might argue that these feelings are realistic and normal. After all, there’s all that pressure to hit targets, all that responsibility and all those decisions that have to be taken without enough information. Then there’s so little feedback on your performance – that’s bound to lead to some anxiety.

But I sense that many senior people spend too much of their time thinking about negative things – about all the things that aren’t going right, such as a star associate leaving or a client making you re-tender for work. Then there’s all the things that could go wrong – that’s an endless list!

In my one-to-one coaching work I find it helpful to think about each of my clients as two people. There’s the person and there’s the voice in their head!

The voice in their head says things like:

  • “The others are better at me at X, Y, Z”
  • “I should be more knowledgeable or skilled to do this work better”
  • “I ought to get more profitable clients, otherwise my position in the firm will be weakened”
  • “I might mess this negotiation up and get blamed”

If you’re wondering what I mean about the voice in the head – it‘s that voice!

All these ‘oughts’ and ‘shoulds’ and focus on blame and faults create a negative spiral. It takes the spring out of your step. Frankly it can make you less fun to be around! And much less of a successful leader, with fewer committed followers.

So what is the alternative? Here are some suggestions – all of which have made a huge difference to senior people I have worked with.

  1. See the glass being at least half full – not half empty! Focus on what’s good and one your strengths.
  2. Take yourself less seriously. When you hear that inner voice whispering in your ear, don’t beat yourself up, but have a little chuckle to yourself.
  3. See all that wonderful potential in your associates. Praise people whenever you can. Say ‘well done’ to yourself. As Michelangelo said: ‘Inside the slab of marble is a beautiful statue – my job is simply to chip away all the unwanted stone’.
  4. Lead by example. If the leaders are going around being miserable, it’ll be contagious. The whole firm will become infected
  5. Challenge all the assumptions you’ve made about who is good and who isn’t – about who likes you and who doesn’t. Most of these assumptions are likely to be stories you initially made up and have sought to reinforce. Be open to the possibilities that there is more good and more potential out there.
  6. Have a vision for your team. Everybody wants to know where you’re sailing the ship – particularly those more junior than you working in the equivalent of the engine room.

As Ben Zander, conductor of the Boston Philharmonic, says about teaching: ‘If the eyes of your students aren’t shining, ask yourself the question – how am I being that stops their eyes shining?’

Finally, remember that you do have a choice!

Here’s to a better, more rewarding, more positive, more uplifting 2017 with many more possibilities!

Posted in Coaching and Training, Leadership and Management, Managing Change | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

How to Improve Practice Group Profitability

unprofitableDo all the practice groups in your firm make an adequate margin? If not, what is being done to address the deficiency?

I’ve been involved in several projects which have looked at how to improve profitability. Here’s my proposed approach, including:

  • the key questions to ask – strategic and operational are both important,
  • what I do to answer the questions – both hard data (typically spreadsheet from Accounts) and soft data (beliefs held by partners and their behaviours) are needed
  • the actions to take to improve profitability – usually a mixture of quick wins and deeper changes to matter management.

Issues to Address and Actions to Take

  1. Are partners doing the right kind of work for the right kind of clients? 

To answer this question, you will need to review the financial data on profitability by work type and by client. This should help you produce a strategy for focusing on selling profitable work by work type and client type.

  1. Are the partners selling the value of the work well (eg benefits to clients, risks mitigated etc)?

Some partners will be better than others at selling the same type of work. It will help to analyse your financial data on profitability by partner and talk to partners to establish their approach and attitude to selling.

You can then produce best practice guides and offer workshops on how to sell value.

  1. Are the partners pricing the work properly?

Meetings with partners can help to establish their approach and attitude to pricing. There will be differences! It might help to review engagement letters to highlight any key differences.

This can help you produce a pricing manual which shows how much this work has cost before. Some firms have found value from brainstorming some creative pricing propositions. Client want certainty and risk-sharing. You could also design workshops on how to price legal work

  1. Are partners negotiating well at the outset and re-negotiating when the scope changes (eg clients asking you to review all leases rather than a sample etc)?

To tackle this question, I would talk to partners to establish their approach and attitude to fee negotiating and re-negotiating. Best practice could then be codified and workshops could be delivered on fee negotiating

  1. Are partners managing the work efficiently?

To answer this question, I would talk to partners about their approach and attitude to managing matters (delegating, supervision, managing risk etc). It would also help to review how matters have been resourced to assess if more delegation is possible. It usually can! It might also help to hear the views of associates.

The output from this could be an improved matter management toolkit.

 

Such a programme is relatively quick to deliver and improved results can start to be seen in around 6 months. Has your firm got a practice group that needs its profitability levels to be addressed?

Posted in Coaching and Training, Leadership and Management, Managing Change, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Influencing Skills for Professionals – The Six Principles

influencingWe all need to get better at influencing others: clients, colleagues, friends etc. Here is a summary of  the best-selling book Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. I’ve adapted the themes and applied them to the world of professionals such as lawyers and accountants.

The author, Robert Cialdini, is a Professor at Arizona State University. He proposes that there are six principles underpinning the skills of persuasion:

  1. Reciprocity – we tend to return a favour
  2. Commitment & Consistency – if we commit to an idea or goal, orally or in writing, we are more likely to achieve it
  3. Social Proof – we will do things that they see other people are doing
  4. Authority – we tend to obey authority figures, even if we are asked to perform objectionable acts
  5. Liking – we are more easily persuaded by other people that we like
  6. Scarcity – perceived scarcity will generate demand

I’m going to explain each of these in turn and provide tips for how professionals such as lawyers and accountants can use them.

  1. Reciprocity

Cialdini says: “The implication is you have to go first. Give something: give information… to people and they will want to give you something in return.”

Professionals – you have lots of things you can give: your time and attention, really listening and acknowledging clients’ opinions, free advice, a free audit of commercial or legal risks, online resources, training, introductions to others in your network etc. Could you be offering more?

2. Commitment & Consistency

Cialdini says: “People strive for consistency in their commitments. They also prefer to follow pre-existing attitudes, values and actions.” Getting clients to publicly commit to something makes them more likely to follow through with an action.

The older we get, the more we value consistency. And that makes it harder for older people to make a change.

Professionals – instead of saying “Please call if you have to cancel”, ask instead “Will you please call if you have to cancel?”. A subtle but important difference. This gets clients to say yes, and measurably increases their response rates.  Also a way to help older clients make a change is to praise them for making good past decisions, based on the information they had at the time. Then find ways to stress the consistent values connecting old decisions with values underlying any new actions (such as using your services).

3. Social Proof

When people are uncertain about a course of action, they tend to look to those around them to guide their decisions and actions. They especially want to know what everyone else is doing – especially their peers. “Laugh tracks on comedy shows exist for this very reason,” Cialdini says.

Professionals – testimonials from satisfied clients show your target audience that people who are like them have enjoyed your service. They’ll be more likely to become clients themselves. Written comments can be reassuring, but video recordings work better.

4. Authority

People respect authority. They want to follow the lead of real experts. Business titles, impressive clothing, and even driving an expensive, high-performing automobile are proven factors in lending credibility to any individual. Just wearing a white lab coat gave the technicians in the famous Milgram experiments a surprising amount of authority.

Professionals should look for authority figures, such as government officials, regulators, highly regarded, blue-chip clients to be amongst their client lists. This will help encourage other clients to choose you.

5. Liking

“People prefer to say ‘yes’ to those they know and like,” Cialdini says. People are also more likely to favour those who are physically attractive, similar to themselves, or who give them compliments. Even something as ‘random’ as having the same name as your prospects can increase your chances of making a sale.

Professionals can put more effort into building rapport with their clients. Let those aspects of your nature that are similar to the client shine through. But don’t fake this. It has to be authentic to work. Spend more time finding out what they like and don’t like about the service they receive from other professional advisers.

6. Scarcity

The less there is of something, the more valuable it is. The more rare and uncommon a thing, the more people want it.

Professionals should consider developing more unique products or services and not just offering ‘me-too’ ones. This might simply be a different way of taking instructions or providing updates using an extranet or different approaches to matter management. If other firms don’t do it like you do it, you have a scarcer product which clients might be more attracted to.

Most of us think it’s hard to understand why we decide what we do. Cialdini thinks that influencing others isn’t luck or magic – it’s science.

For a short TED Talk presentation on Cialdini’s principles of influencing, with details of scientific evidence, see http://ed.ted.com/on/NqsYCu67

 

 

 

Posted in Business Development and Selling, Leadership and Management, Managing Change | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Using the Skills of Improv to Build Better Rapport

improvIf you are unfamiliar with the term, by Improv I mean a form of theatre (improvisational theatre) where what is performed is created in the moment. In its purest form, the dialogue, action, story, and characters are created collaboratively by the players as the improvisation unfolds in present time, without the use of a prepared script.

A marvellous workshop delivered by Neil Mullarkey at King & Wood Mallesons’ London office taught me so much. Neil was an early pioneer of Improv and set up the Comedy Store in London.

If you’ve seen Improv in action, you might have seen the exercise where each person in a group, say of 4 people, says a word in turn and the group needs to complete sentences that make sense. So it might start as:

I… Went… To… The… Zoo… And…

The challenge is to stay in the moment and trust you will find an appropriate word without thinking ahead to introduce your favourite animal or whatever other thought you had. It’s about really, really listening and forcing yourself not to be thinking ahead about what you want to say. These are important skills for all of us.

It’s about intentional listening – listening to understand rather than listening to respond. As has been said before: ‘Don’t think that when he goes quiet he’s listening – he’s just reloading!’

The other person will give you what are called offers in the Improv world. They might say to you ‘Good morning Doctor’. If we want to build rapport (and if we want to get on better with people we should be doing this), we can respond to the word ‘good’, ‘morning’ or ‘doctor’.

If the other person blocks us with ‘I’m not a doctor’, there are several responses such as ‘Of course – I’d forgotten you’ve retired’ or ‘You’re not a doctor – I’m not a patient!’. Both of these replies mirror the style of the initial riposte and maintain rapport.

Neil uses an acronym LAGER to explain the skills required (and hands out beer mats to help you remember them!).

L – Listen actively for ‘offers’ (sometimes described by therapists as a bid for connection)

A – Accept offers

G – Give offers in return

E – Explore assumptions (your own and others’)

R – Reincorporate previous offers (to build even more rapport)

Most of us get blocked a lot at work. We can easily feel rejected and respond thinking they are a rotter or we can think it was our fault that we got blocked. It might be worth trying these mirroring responses.

Another well-used exercise used in Improv is the ‘Yes, and…’ game. Again this encourages rapport by avoiding a contrary set of exchanges. Whatever the other person says, you start by saying ‘Yes, and…’

It sounds somewhat forced but it works in creating more collaborative, non-judgemental relationships.

It’s about being open to what others are thinking and saying and not closing down our thinking too early.

I’m reminded of the exercise in Daniel Kahneman’s book Thinking Fast & Slow:

If a bat and ball cost $1.10 and the bat costs $1 more than the ball, how much does the ball cost?

Most of us get this wrong and say $0.10.

We will all benefit from slowing down, really listening, being less judgemental, building more rapport. Maybe we should all learn the art of Improv?

See also, https://tonyreiss.com/2011/11/11/how-to-establish-credibility-build-rapport-and-become-a-trusted-advisor/

For more on building rapport on the phone, see https://tonyreiss.com/2012/07/10/hitting-it-off-with-people-on-the-phone/

 

 

 

 

Posted in Business Development and Selling, Coaching and Training, Leadership and Management | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Coaching Support for Partners Leading Professional Service Firms

First of all let’s acknowledge the challenges and frustrations inherent in your role. You knew it wasn’t going to be easy – but this?

There are good days and bad days and lots of in-between days, but it’s a tough role. More than anybody else in the firm, you know the number of issues that need addressing and the scale of the challenges your firm faces. There are rewards, of course. But it can be a bit of a lonely place and you can feel the weight of decision-making on your shoulders.

I hope you’re proud of your achievements. Perhaps you’ve initiated a process to review your strategy or looked at merger partners or recruited some talented partners or Finance/BD professionals. Whatever those achievements are, when the going gets tough (which it will), replay those positive thoughts in your mind!

I say this because I’m aware that most of you are probably trained in your professional field (legal, accounting etc) who have been especially trained in analysing detail and seeing things in black and white. Management is rather more grey! There’s hardly ever a right or wrong – never a perfect solution. So it helps to see the glass half full – not half empty! Achievements and opportunities, not failures or problems!

Those who get on top of the role seem to have more focus. They pick three or four initiatives and do them really well, rather than having a list of 92 projects, many of which fizzle out. Change is hard and needs more energy than we might think. Partners and staff need to be reminded of where you’re trying to sail the ship. Plus they’re human beings (on a good day!) and need more support in whatever changes you’re seeking to introduce.

If you were in industry, you’d have had loads of training in leadership and you’d have an executive coach – someone you could talk to in confidence to guide you through the challenges and support you.

Sherwood PSF Consulting is a specialist coaching firm in the professions. We have seven fully trained coaches and have coached 100’s of partners over the last 10 years, most of whom were in management positions.

For a free one-off consultation, give me a call on my direct number 020 8408 2242.

Posted in Coaching and Training, Leadership and Management | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

‘The Inner Game’ for Lawyers

inner-gameLawyers are a self-critical bunch – too self-critical sometimes!

I consistently hear lawyers saying ‘I’m no good at selling’ or something similar. This is where the world of ‘the inner game’ and tennis coaching comes in!

One of the most important coaching books ever written in my view was Tim Gallwey’s book, The Inner Game of Tennis. Not only did it start a trend in sports coaching but it effectively created a whole new industry – executive coaching!

Let’s start by summarising Gallwey’s key propositions.

Gallwey’s propositions in the tennis world

  1. There is an ‘outer game’, comprising technique, fitness, strategy etc and there is an ‘inner game’, comprising concentration, dealing with self doubt, dealing with anxiety etc. Evidence for the existence of the inner game comes from hearing statements such as:

‘When I’m practising, I play well. But I fall apart when I’m playing a game.’

‘If I concentrate on doing one thing right, I forget doing everything else!’

  1. To master the inner game, we need to recognise the existence of two different states: Self 1 is the ‘teller’ and Self 2 is the ‘doer’. So after a bad backhand shot in tennis, Self 1 says to Self 2 on each subsequent backhand:

‘No – not like that! Keep your backswing low and follow through….You are useless at backhands….Try giving up and run around to play forehands!’

You can imagine being Self 2 and feeling your confidence sapping and your tension rising. Not conducive to playing well. Frustration builds.

  1. The answer to address this problem lies in quietening this Self 1 dialogue and trusting your Self 2 to deliver. Imagine being a top tennis player and returning a serve from a fast server. The ball takes less than half a second to get to you. There’s no time to think about where to put your feet and the angle of your racket. You just have to trust that your body knows how to do it….and then just do it!
  1. One helpful way of quietening Self 1 is to let go of being judgemental. Avoid criticising yourself or imagining others criticising you. It’s still important to notice what’s going on, but see it happening as a neutral person and avoid either criticism or praise.

You might be surprised to see me writing ‘avoid praise’. The reason this is important is because the absence of praise then easily becomes the equivalent of criticism. So, quietening Self 1is like becoming the neutral umpire rather than being a partisan player.

How the Inner Game applies to lawyers doing Business Development

My thesis is that lawyers are their own worst enemies when contemplating their BD role. Their Self 1 voice dominates and whilst there is this negative voice, there is an increased chance of limiting actions and results. My evidence for this is:

  • The majority of partners and senior associates doing less BD than wanted by management
  • So many senior lawyers telling me that they don’t know how to do it.

Compare the usual approach to BD with ‘the inner game’ approach:

Usual Approach to BD

Step 1 – Thinking & Feeling Incompetent

Examples:

‘I’ve been on a training course, but still feel uncertain about what to talk about at receptions’

‘I’m ok at doing presentations but fear looking stupid when they ask me questions’

‘I lost another pitch. I must be doing something wrong’

Step 2 – Tell Yourself to Change- Try Harder

The result: Doing it in a self-conscious way with tension and little grace

Step 3 – Doing it with Critical Judgement

Leading to: frustration at failure or only partial success, leading to more feelings of incompetence

….and so the pattern and cycle continues….

‘Inner Game’ Approach to BD

Step 1 – Observing Behaviours Non-Judgementally

Examples:

‘I noticed that I was easily distracted when listening to that client’

‘I can see that there’s a pattern to the feedback we’re getting from clients

‘I enjoy doing xyz work for ABC clients’

Step 2 – Ask Yourself to Change – Envision success

The result: Picturing yourself being relaxed and competent, perhaps re-living a recent positive experience or stepping into the shoes of someone else you admire

Step 3 – Trust Yourself to do it – Let it Happen

Leading to: A calmer disposition and greater capacity to observe and listen and adapt as required. A greater chance of success!

Examples Using the Inner Game in BD

  1. Junior partner grows up – A partner who had been at the firm since being a trainee lacked credibility with other partners and clients. He just wasn’t getting involved in the big deals and selling big ticket work. The coaching revealed that the partner was overly conscious that, though he was a partner, he felt he was only a junior one! That was his inner voice getting in the way of being effective.

By adopting a more adult demeanour and seeing himself as a fully deserving member of the ‘club’, he became much more impressive. He spoke earlier in group meetings and his voice had added conviction. He started generating more BD ideas and spending more time networking with clients and spending less time worrying about what other partners thought of him

  1. Silence is Golden – A head of a practice group talked too much – particularly when having lunches with clients! Coaching helped the partner realise that the inner anxiety was caused by two negative thoughts:
    1. If he stopped talking there might be silence and that would be embarrassing!
    2. If the partner allowed the client too much airtime, the partner might not have the ability to shine!

Our coaching focussed on the art of conversation and questioning and listening skills. These were skills that the partners had in ‘real life’ and when the partner looked at these lunches differently, they went much better.

  1. Senior Associate becomes a Human Being Again – it became obvious during a BD workshop I was running that one associate ‘changed’ when doing the role-play exercises and became less effective at building a relationship with the actor playing the client. Instead of being warm and friendly, as he was during a conversation during the coffee break, he became stiff and formal (which was how he was imagining a lawyer should be!).

The ‘inner game’ was telling the associate that they had to be impressive. This led to too much tension and too little grace. When he imagined ‘just being himself’, it all worked much better. He listened better to the client and reflected back what the client was talking about.

Addendum:

An old Cherokee is teaching his grandson about life. “A fight is going on inside me,” he said to the boy.

“It is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves. One is evil – he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, and ego.” He continued, “The other is good – he is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith. The same fight is going on inside you – and inside every other person, too.”

The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather, “Which wolf will win?”

The old Cherokee simply replied, “The one you feed.”

Posted in Business Development and Selling, Coaching and Training | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

We Can Give Feedback, But Do We Know How to Receive it?

Feedback is a gift!

Seeing Feedback as a Gift!

What’s it like for you in any of these situations:

  • A close relative or friend gives you some critical comments on what you’re wearing
  • Your in-laws give you parenting tips as your toddler has another bout of tantrums in a public place
  • Your child rolls their eyes when you embarrass them in front of their friends

Now ask yourself why you react the way you do. Why don’t you accept the feedback in these circumstances? I suggest it might be for a number of reasons, such as:

  • You don’t agree with the feedback – you think blue and green are perfectly good colours to wear together
  • You don’t understand the feedback – you didn’t read the book or watch the documentary they are basing their advice on
  • You don’t trust their viewpoint – what do they know about fashion, wearing that ridiculous tie?
  • You don’t think they understand – after all, they haven’t asked me why I did what I did
  • You doubt you can do anything about it – that’s who I am. I don’t want to change and even if I did, I don’t think I can change!

Hold those thoughts. Now let’s move this on to a work context…

At the start of leadership programmes, I often ask people what they find challenging as managers. One of the most often stated difficulties is giving feedback to others – particularly when there is a perceived problem that needs to be addressed.

I then ask participants how they like to receive feedback. They invariably come up with a good list of factors that help. The say the feedback should be:

  • Specific – describe the situation, the action that was taken and the impact of that action, so we understand it
  • Non-judgemental – ‘the document was late’ is preferred to ‘you are slow’
  • Timely – it clearly doesn’t work at an annual performance review to raise an incident in a meeting 8 months ago
  • Given in manageable chunks – if you find yourself saying ‘And the 92nd thing is…’ you know you are going too far
  • Balanced – don’t just mention the bad stuff. If there were some positive aspects regarding performance, be fair and mention those as well

At this stage, I realise that traditional feedback training isn’t hitting the spot. Those attending training courses know what works and what doesn’t when giving feedback. But little improvement is being made back in the office…

Then I discovered Sheila Heen doing a TED Talk on YouTube (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQNbaKkYk_Q).  She and her colleagues have diagnosed what the problem really is… to improve feedback inside organisations (and in life) the focus should be more on equipping the receiver. It’s the receiver who is in charge. We decide what to take in.

And we all have a strong tendency to scan the feedback to see what’s wrong with it! Otherwise we have to live with it, niggling away in the back of our mind.

The truth is we all have blind spots. There are things our mums and best friends know about us that we don’t know about ourselves. Some of these things might not be good to hear. But they are true.

So what can we do about it? Here are some suggestions:

  1. Decide you want to know about your blind spots – to learn more about yourself so you can become a better person
  2. Get yourself a little black book and write down the feedback you receive and any reflections you make about your performance
  3. When you get a quiet moment, read the content of your little black book and reflect on whether there is a pattern of comments
  4. Consider getting yourself a mentor or coach to help you make sense of the feedback and develop a personal plan for performance improvement
  5. Every time you get some feedback, either well delivered or clumsily delivered, try to receive it as a gift!

Hope you found this article a gift!

 

 

Posted in Coaching and Training, Leadership and Management | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mind, Body and Voice Skills for Lawyers

voiceI’ve introduced a learning and development programme with our specialist acting colleagues, called ‘Mind, Body, Voice’, and the results are amazingly positive.

Yes, lawyers can learn from actors….not accountants, or bankers, or other City types….but those skilled in the arena of stagecraft.

The point I’m going to make is that each profession has probably mastered a few things that other professions would benefit from.

For example, I was hearing one of our top swimming athletes saying that they had learned from ballet specialists and gymnasts and had successfully shaved a few hundredths of a second off their times.

Back to lawyers and actors….what are the things actors can teach lawyers about how to think, feel, behave to achieve better results when they go, as it were, on stage?

There are four classic stages for making interventions to change our patterns. We can influence:

  • how we think
  • how we feel
  • how we behave
  • how we see the results

Here’s how actors can help lawyers at each of these stages of the pattern:

Changing how lawyers think

Many lawyers have a stressful life and suffer from having negative thoughts, such as: ‘It’s could go badly’….’I’m not knowledgeable enough’….’What if this happens?’ Such thinking is unlikely to assist a positive outcome.

Actors (and others) use visualisation techniques to picture a positive outcome. I once asked a performer how they deal with nerves before they go on stage. She said ‘I tell myself that the audience are like children and they’ll want to follow me on a journey’. This transforms her state so she can walk on to the stage at her best.

The state we’re trying to create by intervening at this level is ‘I know how to do this and can see myself doing this well’.

Changing how lawyers feel

A nervous or anxious state can create physiological effects, such as sweaty palms, butterflies, raised heartbeat etc. Another one that you might be less aware of is a shallower breathing pattern.

A useful technique, again known to actors, is to regulate and steady the breathing – firstly by breathing out through the mouth and then taking a few slow deep breaths through the nose. After a few breaths, this can create a calmer more positive disposition.

The state we’re trying to create by intervening at this level is ‘I feel confident and relaxed about doing this’.

Changing how lawyers behave

Getting the body language right is so important to a successful outcome. Our workshops with lawyers work a lot on posture and voice. How do we stand, sit or speak when we’re at our best? How can we recreate this when in potentially more stressful situations?

We find it helpful to work with a video and give personal one-to-one feedback to lawyers. Sometimes the work we have successfully done on thinking and feeling is sufficient on its own to improve the behaviour. For other people, our intervention on the behaviour acts as the trigger to assist more beneficial thoughts and feelings. Again, transformational results have been achieved.

The state we’re trying to create by intervening at this level is ‘I am doing it well’.

Changing how lawyers see the results

Lawyers tend to be somewhat self-critical. They see what they didn’t get totally right. To some extent this is understandable given that profession needs to focus on getting everything correct (eg the wording of a complicated contract).

Actors are also working in a critical world and have needed to learn the art of seeing good and acknowledging the positives.

Lawyers could benefit from learning how to see the glass half full, rather than half empty.

The state we’re trying to create by intervening at this level is ‘I did x and y well and if I did z next time, it would be even better’.

I hope there’ve been some useful insights in this article. Maybe the next article in this series should be…..What Actors Could Learn from…..Lawyers?

 

Posted in Coaching and Training | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment