Changing How We Think, Feel, Behave to be More Effective – the art of cutting a new groove

We are who we are!  Can’t change!  Take us or leave us!  Right?  Well, possibly. But what would it look like if we could change? Would we be more effective and possibly even enjoy our work more?

This blog will be relevant for you if you can answer ‘yes’ to any of the following questions:

  • I have good days and bad days with certain people
  • Certain situations can bring the worst out in me
  • I know what I should be doing but find it hard sometimes motivating myself to do it
  • I’ve given up trying to get on with some other partners in my firm
  • I wish I enjoyed my work more
  • I wish I could be more effective working with some people or in certain situations

For example, a senior associate might know that he should be delegating more, but struggles to do it and ends up working long hours doing the work himself. He also gets feedback that his style is demotivating some of the junior associates. He wants to change but finds it hard. The answer ‘just delegate!’ doesn’t seem to have worked! Is there anything he can do?

Another associate gets terribly nervous doing presentations. Just the thought of doing them triggers more shallow breathing which makes her voice ‘wobble’ which adds to the feeling of dread. Is there anything she can do to break this pattern?

Without getting into all the technical stuff, we need to understand the basics of what drives us as human beings. We are who we are because of genetics (nature) and experiences (nurture). All this leads us to a set of beliefs about who we are, what we’re good at and what we’re not good at. These then influence us hugely in our workplace and determine what we think in certain situations, how we feel, how we behave and the results we get.

This cycle becomes a pattern which we often repeat, thereby making the pattern more pronounced. It’s like we’re carving a deeper groove. Sometimes the pattern works for us and helps us achieve the results we’re looking for. Sometimes it’s working against us. What psychologists have demonstrated is that we can revisit these beliefs and patterns and choose other ones. It’s as if we can learn to cut a new groove.

Cutting a New Groove

Here are some tips on creating new and potentially more effective patterns of behaviour:

  1. Try to notice what your patterns of behaviour are. Ask yourself how you compare to others. Ask for feedback. This will help you see any blind spots (we all have them). Ask your HR Manager for advice regarding psychometric tests (e.g. Myers Briggs, Insights etc).
  2. Practise centering yourself. Yoga and Pilates point out the strong link between mind and body. They advocate having a strong core and the use of breathing and relaxation to get in touch with the best we can be. This can be particularly helpful in situations in which emotions might be running high.
  3. Use goal mapping – a technique that uses words and images in a diagram to appeal to your whole brain (rather than just the rational side). Look at this diagram every day. It might take a few weeks (don’t forget your existing way of thinking and behaving will have been reinforced over several years), but you should find that you will make the transition to a new way of looking at yourself and a new way of working with others.
  4. Plan ahead more – the idea here is to put into your calendar the action that you tend to avoid, thereby increasing the chances of it happening. A partner, who knew she needed to do more marketing, wrote a day out every month to write articles, arrange to have coffee with clients etc.
  5. Get others to nag you – in the early days in particular we are going to find it hard making changes to how we work. So get support. Perhaps your PA or a partner can help you. Rather than having this one-sided, David Maister advocates giving each other nagging rights. So they help you and you help them!
  6. Notice the triggers – to avoid negative behaviours, try to notice what brings them on and avoid those pre-conditions. Failing that, try to notice when you’re starting to feel annoyed and move to take a break so you can cool down rather than erupt!
  7. Model yourself on others – if there’s a partner who demonstrates the attitude or behaviour you’re seeking to emulate, picture them at the relevant times. Ask yourself ‘what would they do?’ Then step into their shoes and do it! You will be surprised how different your behaviour will be and the different results you’ll get.

The results

  • An associate noticed that she didn’t feel so nervous presenting if she chose not to see it as ‘presenting’ but simply talking about something.
  • For the associate needing to delegate more, it helped when we saw the other person as somebody who was helping and learning and not someone who was likely to get something wrong.
  • Many associates notice that they feel more confident and behave more credibly when they chose to see the talent and experience that they have under their belt – rather than focussing on all the things they don’t know.

Would it help if you looked at some situations differently?

Posted in Coaching and Training, Leadership and Management, Managing Change | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

How strong’s the glue that holds your firm together?

English: This is a picture of a tube of The Or...

Image via Wikipedia

Are you a superglue or masking tape kind of firm?

Do your partners really, really understand what it means to be a partner in your firm? Even all the lateral hires who haven’t grown up in the firm. Even those that have spent a lot of time in firms with very different cultures? With more firms taking on more lateral hires, these become important questions.

Many firms have values which get mentioned on websites and in brochures. Words such as ‘Excellence’, ‘Commercial’, ‘Innovative’, ‘Teamwork’, ‘Client Service’ etc are typically mentioned but usually mean something slightly different in each firm. And I’m not convinced partners and staff know what these words really mean in their firms, particularly when it comes to making decisions.

Some people think all law firms are pretty much the same. There are a lot of similarities certainly. But having worked with more than 30 of the top 50 firms, I can assure you that the differences are marked and worth developing because being distinctive (in a good way) helps you attract clients and talented staff.

Let me explain what I mean with an example…..

I used to work at Deloitte Haskins & Sells as a strategy consultant. When we launched our values, we decided to embed the values by introducing a set of multiple choice questions and asked teams to discuss them with a member of the Board present to guide us. I remember being surprised by the recommended answers to some of the questions. For example we were encouraged to be more tactfully assertive with clients. The process really clarified our values and made decision-making much easier. It also strengthened our brand, but that’s another story…..

One way of testing whether your firm has strong glue is to see if there’s consistency about the answers to questions which pose ethical dilemmas, such as:

  • As a junior partner, how would you handle a situation where a client complains about the service from a more senior specialist partner? Would you say anything? Who would you go to? What would you say?
  • A client changes a deadline which might require a junior to leave an important training programme – how do you handle this situation? Do you get the associate back from the training? Do you negotiate with the client? If so, what do you say?
  • How would you handle a potential conflict situation, perhaps where you have definite litigation work compared to a pitch for potential longer term work for a prospect? Do you argue your case or adopt a ‘what’s best for the firm approach’?

Many firms are trying to establish a culture of entrepreneurship whilst at the same time developing good ‘corporate citizens’ who share clients and put the interests of the firm above their own. Not an easy task. But this exercise of using ethical dilemmas can help.

Are you a superglue firm? If not, consider using these ethical dilemmas.

Posted in Leadership and Management, Managing Change, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Seven Surprises for New Partners – the role of a partner might not be what you think it is it is.

Original feature article in HBRThe following text is adapted from an article by Michael Porter and colleagues in the Harvard Business Review in October 2004. He wrote about CEO’s as leaders in a corporate world.

I’ve taken his messages and applied them to a professional firm today. The messages seem just as relevant to partners in modern law firms. See what you think?

1. You can’t run the firm – they’ll be so much to do, you have to let go of responsibilities and delegate to others and then monitor and make decisions – your role shifts from having direct influence to getting things done through others.

2. Giving orders is very costly – a pushy style tends to encourage pushback

3. It becomes hard to know what’s really going on – relationships change upon appointment and you’ll drown in information, though informal channels of communication disappear. You become one of them!

4. You are always sending a message – your words and actions get heard and seen by many and are amplified

5. As a new partner don’t think that you are the boss – the governance of law firms is simple though subtle – you report to the head of the practice group and then the Board who report in turn to the partners.

6. Managing the firm is not about pleasing the partners. That is not the goal – such actions might not be in the firm’s interests. Be prepared for your fellow partners to be uncomfortable and challenge your ideas.

7. Even though you are now a partner, you are still only human – resist the illusions of self-importance, omnipotence and omniscience and try to keep a connection with the world outside the business. It’ll keep you grounded and sane.

Do these messages seem relevant to you?

Posted in Business Development and Selling, Leadership and Management | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The 10 Commandments for New Partners

English: 10 Commandments within St Mary Woolno...

10 Commandments in London Church

 I’ve had the great pleasure of working with a number of inspirational managing partners, particularly on programmes designed to help senior associates  transition successfully to their new role as partners.

Here is my synopsis of some of the best advice I’ve heard – what you might call the 10 commandments to new partners:

1. Think of this as just another step in the process, having had your first day in school, college, law school etc. You might think that this is it, but in many ways you are just starting again. Plus, it’ll be good to accept that you’ve still got much to learn!

2. Get yourself organised to cope with the various pulls on your time. Consider all the things you do to sort out priorities and be rigorous about continuing to be on top of your in-tray. Remember you don’t have to do everything. Delegate!.

3. You are now inextricably linked with your firm – make sure you fully incorporate the firm’s values into your own and live them.

4. Treat people well. You will be judged in part by how you treat people who cannot advance your career – that’s how people will judge who you really are.

5. Remember that your role and status comes not from what’s on your business card, but from the eye of the beholder – you have to earn people’s respect.

6. Don’t get too full of yourself – particularly in the early days

7. Try to be a good role model. Pick the right partners to base this on, not necessarily the ones just ahead of you. But you must be authentic!

8. Think and behave like an entrepreneur, because that’s what this firm needs you to be

9. Put yourself in the shoes of others to better understand their view of the world

10. Start thinking about your career as a partner and what roles you’d like to develop (BD, technical, client partner etc)

Any other great tips for new partners?

Posted in Leadership and Management, Managing Change, Networking, Strategy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A plea to senior associates to step up to the plate….

Ben Tschepikow in action for the Arkansas Razo...

Image via Wikipedia

The job of a senior associate is one of the hardest roles in law firms. They are sort of squeezed in the middle. Being asked to do things by clients, partners and juniors. But often not clear exactly what is being asked of them or how you are doing. It can be a test of stamina and self confidence.

Many senior associates, particularly in the larger firms, make life easier for themselves by just carrying on as if they are still just an associate. It’s as if they’re being pulled downwards. By not obviously being accountable they can duck some of the responsibilities and avoid some of the stress. But by doing this, they also miss out on many of the rewards.

I believe the bigger firms need senior associates to step up to the plate and take more responsibility. If only because it will free up partners to spend more time on adding value through investing in client relationships and business development.

To make this point come alive, I have imagined being a senior partner delivering a speech at the start of a development programme for senior associates. This is what I’d say:

“This isn’t a typical training course. You’ve done all that…..presentation skills, negotiating skills, marketing courses. This programme is different because you’re now in a different place in your careers. 

First of all….congratulations! You might sometimes think there’s still so much to learn, but let’s focus on how far up the mountain you’ve already climbed. Think back to your early days as a lawyer….all those times you had to ask for help when you didn’t know where to start, the feelings of nervousness presenting at your first client meeting etc. 

We sometimes focus too much on what we don’t know rather than what we do. You wouldn’t have got to where you are today if the glass wasn’t at least half full! 

But as senior associates, it’s different now. From now on, it’s not just about being a good technical lawyer. On the matters you are working on, it’s about contributing as a leader in this firm…. 

And, as you sit here now, regardless of whether you know for sure if you want to be a partner or not, this programme is going to be important to you as a practicing lawyer. 

Let’s explore this role as a leader. What do effective leaders do and how does this relate to your role as senior lawyers at this firm:

  • Effective leaders don’t get sucked into the detail – they keep an eye on the final goal
  • To do this, they make an effort to know what the final goal is. Effective leaders know really clearly what each client needs to ensure they achieve competitive advantage and they know what the firm expects of them in terms of our reputation and mitigating risk
  • Effective leaders are keen to be accountable and they have a confident attitude that says “put me down to do that”!
  • They are interested in their clients – not just the transaction. They care about their clients’ businesses and they care about their clients as people.
  • They are interested in their team. They take pleasure in developing the talents of others, in being a good mentor. That way they find that others want to work for them. 

We know that not all our partners make it easy for you to play your full role as a leader. But we’re all grown ups and it’s for you to influence others to ensure you are contributing as a leader in whatever ways you can.

We’re offering you this opportunity to show us what you can do and we’re offering support along the way……”

Posted in Leadership and Management, Managing Change | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A plea to stingy clients – written by John Ruskin in the 19c, yet relevant to today’s market

John Ruskin

Image via Wikipedia

Some useful advice to law firms on pricing….

“There is hardly anything in this world which some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper and the people who consider price alone are this man’s lawful prey, as it is unwise to pay too much as it is to pay too little.

When you pay too much you lose a little money. That is all.

When you pay too little you sometimes lose everything, because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the things it was bought to do.

The common law of business balance prohibits paying too little and getting a lot…..it cannot be done.

If you deal with the lowest bidder it is well to add something for the risk you run. And if you do that, you will have enough to pay for something better [in the first place].”

John Ruskin 1819-1900

Posted in Business Development and Selling, Fee Negotiating, Managing Change, Networking | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Winston Churchill Close to a Sales Pitch

Winston Churchill (1874 – 1965) English: Winst...

The Great Man – getting ready for a close?

Those brought up in the world of commercial selling are trained in the art of closing – the process of encouraging the prospect to take a step towards buying your product or service.

Many of us find it hard to close. It makes us feel uncomfortable. We’re anxious that we’ll be seen as too pushy. Or we’re anxious that the prospect might say ‘no’ and we’ll feel rejected. So we tend to avoid closing. The downside is that potential sales are missed.

To help lawyers understand the closing process, here’s an adaptation of the famous Benjamin Franklin close which is very popular in the commercial world of selling. Do we think it is applicable to selling legal services? Is it an example of sleight of mouth which might undermine trust in the relationship or a helpful process?

You`ve just finished making your pitch, but the prospect is undecided and can`t make up his mind. Suddenly you say something like this, “You know, Winston Churchill was one of the wisest and most decisive and respected men in history. Wouldn`t you agree, Mr. Smith?”

“Whenever he was faced with a tough decision, he would take a plain piece of paper, draw a line down the middle and put a plus sign on one half, and a minus sign on the other. He found that if he listed the benefits and the negative things , it would help him see the best course of action. Do you think that might help?

With your permission, I`d like to suggest we borrow Churchill`s method for just a moment. To help you in making a decision, let’s list the benefits – some of the reasons you should make this purchase. Then we`ll list the negatives. Fair enough?”

You pass the piece of paper and pen to the prospect and ask them simply to list all of the benefits of your offering.

You might start off by suggesting one of the benefits but then let the prospect list most of them. Whatever the prospect writes down will obviously be the main points of interest to him. Make sure you develop a complete list, perhaps by prompting with appropriate areas to explore such as reporting, communication, geographical coverage, technical expertise etc.

After you`ve listed all of the positive points, let the prospect list the negatives. Don`t say a word while the prospect is listing the negatives.

What is fascinating is that the list of negatives is always be shorter than the list of positives. Why? Because usually the only negatives prospects can think of have to do with price.

Once the list has been completed you say, “Mr. Smith, if Winston Churchill was looking at this piece of paper with the benefits you have listed versus the reasons not to have those benefits, don’t you think he would choose the benefits?”

This approach has been closing sales in the commercial world for decades. Do we think it is applicable for selling legal services? What other ways of closing help you get clients to commit to buying your services?

Posted in Business Development and Selling, Coaching and Training, Fee Negotiating, Networking | Tagged | 1 Comment

Building a Successful New Practice Group – a detailed study into why most initiatives fail and the factors critical for success

Most firms are finding it difficult to build new practice groups and are disappointed at the rate of progress. Many blame the fact that their firm’s ‘brand name’ works against them. But we were not sure that was a valid reason, so we conducted a study. Of the 20 or so case studies we investigated, most of the initiatives were judged to have failed. But what was most interesting was the similar pattern of behaviours for the initiatives that succeeded.

From this analysis, we have developed a template of best practice in the form of a phased approach, the details of which are below:

Phase 0 – Lay Foundations for Success

Many new practice groups fail before they’ve even started because the foundations for success are not laid.

Those firms that succeed tend to appoint a project sponsor at this stage. This person should ideally have influence within the firm. The role of this person becomes more important in the next stage, but one of their critical tasks in this early phase is to ensure that the right group leader is appointed.

Ideally the leader for the new group should be an internal appointment because the next phases are tricky and only an insider will know the ropes. But it isn’t always possible to find a suitable candidate from within. Nine firms in our study recruited outsiders. They were all given a year to succeed. In all cases this was extended, but all the partners except three were deemed to have failed and these were the only ones to stay longer than two years. Indeed, one group made two failed attempts with successive outside partners, but achieved modest success when they made up a senior associate from inside the firm.

Phase 1 – Project Set Up

Again, the firms that achieve only modest successes tend to put less emphasis on this phase. The leader has some critical tasks:

To clarify what the firm expects – too often the Board are vague and this creates scope for misunderstandings. At one level it makes it difficult to measure achievements. At another level it leads to a lack of clarity as to what support the new group is going to need from the sponsor or others.

To build a profile for the embryonic group internally – at one end of the spectrum, there can be a lack of any knowledge that the initiative is underway. At the other end, rumours and misunderstandings can easily spread which can lead to partners blocking progress unnecessarily. The project sponsor needs to be there to support if necessary.

To appoint a core team– no single person can grow a new practice by themselves. The ideal core team to initiate a new practice group comprises 2 or 3 partners and their teams. Any more than 5 partners is frankly unworkable and time will end up being wasted debating a plan and priorities. It may be appropriate to keep a wider team informed of developments, perhaps because the new practice group links with their type of work, the sector/industry they serve or because you might be sharing clients.

To draft a business plan – typically what happens here is that the leader drafts a plan and shows it to others. Some reply with comments. Many don’t. And if they do, the comments aren’t always constructive. This isn’t the best approach. If you want commitment it’s much better to get the core group to draft the plan. This way it’s everybody’s plan and you will find more things get done.

To agree roles, responsibilities and measures of success – teams tend to perform better with these aspects clear and, though this sounds obvious, it happens rarely. Again completing this step more rigorously can make a big difference when it comes to getting action. Bear in mind that the leader doesn’t have to do everything. The other partners can take the roles of Marketing, Finance, HR/Recruitment etc.

To educate and train your staff – to be able to deliver any new expertise required. This is critical to be able to win work and persuade clients of your ability to do it well

Timeframe: 6 to 9 months to build a committed team.

Phase 2 – Raise profile and win instructions

Now the fun and hard work really starts! The critical success factors are as follows:

Successful business development projects underway – a provisional business plan may already exist. What is needed now is a short list of BD projects. Avoid being over-ambitious. It can take too long to get complicated projects completed and the group can lose enthusiasm.

Team members committed to activity – it helps if the group members volunteer to be accountable for certain projects, rather than the leader hand out jobs. Commitment and enthusiasm are a vital factor in getting the new team off the ground.

Regular team meetings – and the more frequent and more informal, the better. Too often groups assume the best way is to meet monthly and have long boring meetings. Not surprisingly, this puts a lot of people off!

PR plan – one important aspect of the BD plan is getting market profile. One successful group put a good deal of emphasis on this area and became recognised as a leader in a niche field within two years. Enquiries for work and instructions flowed in as a result. As an embryonic group, the marketing budget might be quite small so profile through the web or in leading trade journals can be useful because they are so cheap.

Sales visits –you need to get out there and meet potential clients or referrers. Most lawyers find this activity the least pleasant but it’s essential. I recommend going in pairs.

Growing support for group in the firm – the groups that work best focus at least as much attention inside their firms as outside. As we have already recognised some partners will be anxious about the impact of this new group on their flow of business and will appreciate being kept informed of progress.

Attending other groups’ team meetings – some leaders of new groups have achieved breakthroughs by attending the team meetings of other groups and presenting ways in which they can help them. By targeting the right groups with the right messages, leads will be generated.

Cross selling from other groups – the easiest clients to get will already be clients of the firm. However we are not aware of any law firm which has cracked the challenge of getting an effective cross selling culture in place. If you build good trusted relationships with the Client Partners of appropriate clients, work will be referred to you.

Timeframe: 12-18 months for additional instructions flowing into the firm.

Phase 3 – Grow and consolidate performance

We’re on a roll now or at least should be! But probably not achieving the margins that the firm expects. So the focus of attention in this phase needs to move to addressing the following issues:

Repeat instructions from clients – there’s more instructions from the person who has already instructed you, plus other individuals at the client who can instruct or influence who receives instructions. The groups that do best tend to have clear Client Partner roles and plans for developing client relationships.

Group is growing in size – and the leader again has a plan for helping ensure that there are sufficient people with the skills and appropriate charge out rates for doing the work.

Knowhow system set up – as the group gets bigger it gets harder for each member of the group to know who knows what, so some system with simple processes will help share knowledge, build efficiencies and improve margins.

Other lawyers show interest in joining the group – perhaps one of the best measures of success because most of us like to be associated with success

Higher rankings in industry surveys – love them or hate them, they play a role in creating a perception in the market and can influence who gets short listed for some jobs

Cross selling to other groups – you know you’re doing well when you start introducing other parts of your firm to clients you’ve won in the first place

Acknowledged as a success in the firm – this is what it’s all about and other fledgling groups seek out your advice!

Timeframe: at least 3-5 years to achieve the performance levels of the rest of the firm.

It will have been a challenge, but for those who have done it, it will have been one of the most satisfying experiences of their careers.

Lots of other stuff being prepared on this subject….watch this space!

Posted in Business Development and Selling, Leadership and Management, Managing Change, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

How to Create a Successful Business Development Culture in Law Firms

It’s your heads of practice groups that should drive BD activity – or else they might drive away your best associates

Client partners and heads of practice areas play a key role in influencing the BD performance of the people they manage and motivate. In fact, a study by Gallup suggests these partners are more important in driving sales results than anyone else in the firm, even the managing partner.

According to The Gallup Organization’s research (details below), 80% of an employee’s perception of their firm’s leaders was influenced by their relationship with their direct supervisor. So no matter how good the managing partner is, the employee’s view of the firm is likely to be strongly coloured by their opinion of their direct supervisor.

We may join a firm, but we work for a partner. Gallup has found that when top performers leave firms, 70% of the time it is strongly influenced by their relationship with their direct supervisor. And conversely, when there are stars, there is almost always a good partner in the wings.

A managing partner’s speech, no matter how motivating, does not create the firm’s culture.

Bonuses and perks are not the main contributors to firm’s cultures.

Front-line partners create cultures within their teams.

What is culture, exactly?

Let’s define “culture.” A common simple definition is “the way we do things around here”.

We all know that the cultures of individual practice areas within firms vary widely. What is driving these different workgroup cultures within firms? The difference is primarily the partner leading the practice group. The partner sets the culture for his or her team, and the strength or weakness of that culture directly links to client engagement levels and to business outcomes.

Good intentions, bad results

No partner gets up every day and goes to work determined to create the worst possible culture for his or her employees. But some partners unfailingly achieve this result. The main reasons are:

  1. First, some firms just promote or laterally hire the wrong people into practice management roles.
  2. Even if the latent talent is there, it’s a tricky job and most partners in management roles lack management training. Most lawyers receive a huge amount of training to be a lawyer. But how much training do they get to be a good leader?

As a result, many practice group leaders have little understanding of what they must do to ensure a positive environment for their team members – a culture that contributes to the improved performance of their most productive employees.

Remedies

How can firms find the right people to be partners – the individuals who have good intentions and can produce outstanding results?

First, firms can stop moving the wrong people into leadership roles. I believe firms need to pay more attention to selecting the right candidate for every management position. Sometimes this involves building a talent pool, by recruiting people with the talent to become outstanding partners into the firm at a more junior level.

The bottom line is clear: Partners are instrumental in creating the right workgroup culture for effective business development. Selecting and training BD-oriented partners is one of the best and surest ways to improve the quality of your BD efforts.

And BD functions – what can you do to win over more practice groups heads?

Source: http://gmj.gallup.com/content/328/creating-successful-sales-culture.aspx

Posted in Business Development and Selling, Leadership and Management, Managing Change, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Preparing for relationship-building meetings with clients – an 8-step process

The tips set out below describe what needs to be done before meetings with clients to maximise the chances that the meetings will develop closer and stronger relationships. The preparation falls into two elements:

  • some research to understand the background and context of the world that your client is operating in – to enable you to ‘be in their shoes’ and understand their perspective
  • to use this data to inform your thinking and preparation for the meeting.

1.        Find out about the client as a person

Their ethnic background, age, family, education, pastimes, personality type (outgoing vs shy, big picture vs detail etc), career history (ie where they used to work etc)

2.        Find out about the client’s job

Title, overall role, direct reports, who they report to, role on any relevant projects

3.        Find out about the client’s view of your firm

Level of knowledge and attitude to your firm (On a scale of 1-10, where 1= they don’t know anything about us, through 5= knows a lot and would return a phone call, through to 10=a major advocate who already tells others how good we are). You may have to make an intuitive guess on this depending on whether you have met the person before, and what feel you pick up from others.

4.        Consider what the client might hope for from the meeting

In terms on content:

  • Ideas/insights?
  • Examples/case studies?
  • Practical information?
  • Financial data?

In terms of style:

  • Interactive, not a monologue?
  • Big picture or detail?
  • Logical analysis or more personal friendly approach?
  • Formal presentation or informal discussion?

5.        Consider any fears or anxieties the client may have about the meeting

In terms of content:

  • Level of detail/complexity?
  • Lack of clarity?
  • Waste of time?
  • Exposing their weaknesses?

In terms of style:

  • Too pushy/argumentative?
  • Do’ers not listeners?
  • Manipulative?
  • Boring or too trivial?

Having gathered what information you can, you should spend some time hypothesising about what you don’t know. What’s your best guess? What would you think if you were in the client’s shoes? If important information is not known, consider having a pre-discussion with the client…..”to help me prepare for our meeting it would help me to understand …….”

You will still be left with things you can only guess at, however, having given them some thought you will find you will have fewer surprises during the meeting and will be able to be more flexible and able to take opportunities as they arise …..

6.     Consider what you might hope for from the meeting….

7.      Consider any fears or anxieties you may have about the meeting….

8.     Plan your agenda and approach accordingly…..

You should find your relationship-building meetings with clients will blossom.

Posted in Business Development and Selling, Fee Negotiating, Networking | Leave a comment